✳   A closer view of Venezuela. Our lead research programme is taking shape.Explore the programme
Hedge funds / Distressed debt & special situations

The opportunity has to
clear your bar

Research for fund managers examining the political, counterparty, and operational assumptions behind a distressed-debt thesis.

Discuss a distressed-debt brief
POLICY ACTORS ASSETS EXPOSURERESEARCH WITH A DEFINED MANDATE
Your question, in focus

Find the political assumption in your thesis

Take one expectation from the investment case: access will improve, a counterparty will perform, or a political decision will arrive on time. Define the observable event behind it, then seek evidence that could challenge it as well as support it.

Which observable developments would make us revisit the political assumptions in this thesis?AN ILLUSTRATIVE RESEARCH MANDATE
01 / Research question

The political catalyst

Which named decision, actor, or institutional milestone matters, and over what horizon?

02 / Research question

The counterparty narrative

Which statements are supported by documents and independent observations—and where do accounts diverge?

03 / Research question

The recovery assumptions

Which political or operational assumptions need evidence, and which questions belong with legal or valuation specialists?

A briefing with substance

What a focused
mandate can cover

These are possible research formats. Scope, source access, and delivery are agreed in a briefing conversation.

01

Thesis-question register

Clear questions, deadlines, and the evidence needed to answer them—with unresolved assumptions kept in view.

02

Catalyst and counterparty brief

Relevant actors, documentary milestones, competing accounts, and a record of what has changed.

03

Asset viability note

Documented criteria and missing evidence, kept separate from security valuation or legal conclusions.

Lead development programme

Venezuela
Closer to the asset

Explore the five risk dimensions, scenario framework, and six decision tests alongside an anonymised historical assessment and fictional asset-level examples.

Inside the Venezuela programme
A briefing built for the decision

Where it is heading
Whether it clears your bar

Country direction and commercial viability belong alongside one another. Keep the evidence, the interpretation, and the client’s requirements distinct.

Recognise the research problem

The next investment committee

01

The political catalyst is too broad

A thesis refers to political normalisation without specifying the decision, actor, or observable milestone.

02

Documents and narratives diverge

Company disclosures, procedural records, and public statements point to different parts of the story.

03

The committee needs a review rule

The team needs to know which new evidence would support, challenge, or leave the assumption unresolved.

Where the approach fits

Get more from
a defined mandate

  • Your thesis depends on a political or operational assumption.
  • You research distressed debt, special situations, or complex counterparties.
  • You need to distinguish procedural developments from recovery assumptions.
  • You can name an issuer, asset, counterparty, and decision horizon.
  • You want research that complements legal and valuation specialists.
BEFORE AFTER / FICTIONAL WORKFLOW

From a country thesis
to an assumption register

Starting point
An investment narrative that assumes an operational milestone will follow a political announcement.
Research work
Define the question, compare the documentary record, preserve contradictions, and name the next observation.
Resulting format
An assumption register, catalyst review, and committee questions.
Inspect the complete sample
Explore the work in more detail

See the method
Inspect the output

How to assess the fit

Put one assumption under scrutiny

We can scope a first briefing around a political or operational expectation in your thesis. Agree the time horizon, the competing explanations, and the evidence that would warrant a review.

Judge the proposed work by whether it makes that assumption testable and the reasoning traceable. Valuation, legal conclusions, and investment decisions remain with your team and advisers.

Inspect the fictional thesis-review brief
Start with the question that matters

Which political or operational assumption in your thesis would be most costly to leave untested?

See how we can help you

Tell us your decision and what you would need to see to judge whether our research is useful.